Social MediaWeb Culture

Why Twitter and Facebook Blocked This New York Post Article From Being Shared

0
twitter-facebook
Image courtesy iStock

Facebook and Twitter blocked users from sharing a recent New York Post article that made claims about Hunter Biden shortly after it was published on Wednesday.

According to the story, Hunter Biden, son of U.S. Democratic presidential candidate, Joe Biden was allegedly found to have business dealing with a Ukrainian energy company. The story went to say that the former vice president had personally met with an adviser of the company.

This story which Reuters did not confirm contained details to emails that were reportedly given to the lawyer of Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney. If memory serves you right, then you can remember that this was part of what kickstarted the move to try and impeach President Trump late last year.

This whole saga did cause a frenzy on these social media platforms with users asking why Twitter and Facebook would do this. Twitter prohibited users from posting links to the story. On the other hand, Facebook reduced how often the story pops up in users’ news feed or anywhere else on the site.

Some users id defend the move by Twitter, saying that the article violates some of its policies.

But it looks like censoring the story might have even raised more suspicion from Americans on both the Democratic and Republican sides.

Check This Out:  Kenyans Online React After Kenya Meat Commission is Put Under Ministry of Defence

We have seen social media platforms lately take serious actions against any false information shared concerning the U.S. 2020 elections. Even President Trump has been on the wrong end of this having his tweets flagged as false or even totally hidden from the timeline.

This one though would raise concerns of whether these tech companies are siding with one of the candidates which would not be a good thing for anyone.

Twitter did come out saying that the story violated its “hacked materials” policy. This bars the distribution of content obtained through hacking that contains private information or trade secrets. The company did not go to provide details on what materials were viewed as hacked in the article.

It is still uncertain on why Facebook took similar actions as multiple fact-checkers said the company had not done any fact-checking prior.

Nevertheless, the information on the story has circulated widely and there seems to be no way of stopping it at this point.

Safaricom Home Fibre Wins, Challenges, and The Untold Stories Throughout The Coronavirus Pandemic

You may also like

Comments

Share Your Opinion